.
In the UK/EU today.
Sodomy is tolerated. Enforcing Christian principles in your own home is not.
With this issue, as with most others, we clearly see the implementation and enforcement of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (see below).
Who is really governing the EU?
Who is really governing the UK?
Who is really governing the EU?
Who is really governing the UK?
(BBC News article)
UK: HOMOSEXUAL COUPLE WIN B&B REFUSAL CASE
A HOMOSEXUAL couple who were turned away from a bed and breakfast were discriminated against, it has been ruled.
Michael Black, 64, and John Morgan, 59, booked a double room at the Swiss Bed and Breakfast in Berkshire via email.
When they arrived in March 2010, owner Susanne Wilkinson would not let them stay in a room with a double bed.
The couple, from Brampton near Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire were awarded £1,800 each at Reading County Court for "injury to feelings".
Recorder Claire Moulder said that by refusing the couple access to a double room, Mrs Wilkinson had "treated them less favourably than she would treat unmarried heterosexual couples in the same circumstances".
It comes as a similar case in Cornwall awaits a Supreme Court hearing. Peter and Hazelmary Bull, the Christian owners of a guesthouse in Marazion who also turned away a gay couple have won permission to appeal against their ruling.
It comes as a similar case in Cornwall awaits a Supreme Court hearing. Peter and Hazelmary Bull, the Christian owners of a guesthouse in Marazion who also turned away a gay couple have won permission to appeal against their ruling.
In the latest case, the judge accepted Mrs Wilkinson was genuine about her Christian beliefs and had also stopped unmarried heterosexual couples from sharing a double bed.
Reacting to the ruling, Mrs Wilkinson said: "Naturally, my husband and I are disappointed to have lost the case and to have been ordered to pay £3,600 in damages for injury to feelings.
"We believe a person should be free to act upon their sincere beliefs about marriage under their own roof without living in fear of the law. Equality laws have gone too far when they start to intrude into a family home."
Reacting to the ruling, Mrs Wilkinson said: "Naturally, my husband and I are disappointed to have lost the case and to have been ordered to pay £3,600 in damages for injury to feelings.
"We believe a person should be free to act upon their sincere beliefs about marriage under their own roof without living in fear of the law. Equality laws have gone too far when they start to intrude into a family home."
The Christian Institute had backed Mrs Wilkinson's case.
Mrs Wilkinson was granted permission to appeal against the ruling and said she would give it "serious consideration".
Mr Black said the ruling felt "like a triumph". He said: "It's taken two and a half years to get this far so to get the judgement and be vindicated in it is a great feeling."
He said the only drawback was that Mrs Wilkinson had leave to appeal and, because the case involving the Cornwall guesthouse was due to go to the Supreme Court in late 2013 or early 2014, their own case was unlikely to be heard until after that.
When asked about Mrs Wilkinson's religious beliefs, Mr Black said he was not trying to fight anyone's beliefs. He said: "Running a B&B is not a religion.
He said the only drawback was that Mrs Wilkinson had leave to appeal and, because the case involving the Cornwall guesthouse was due to go to the Supreme Court in late 2013 or early 2014, their own case was unlikely to be heard until after that.
When asked about Mrs Wilkinson's religious beliefs, Mr Black said he was not trying to fight anyone's beliefs. He said: "Running a B&B is not a religion.
"If you are running a B&B you have to abide by the law so either change your job or carry on running a B&B and let gay couples stay."
When asked if the couple were willing to take the case as far as the European Court of Human Rights, Mr Morgan said: "If it is still quite common for this sort of discrimination to take place then I think it needs to be taken all the way to be stopped."
James Welch, from civil rights group Liberty which took up the men's case, said: "It is simply unacceptable for people running a business to refuse to provide a service because of someone's sexual orientation."
James Welch, from civil rights group Liberty which took up the men's case, said: "It is simply unacceptable for people running a business to refuse to provide a service because of someone's sexual orientation."
EXCERPT FROM THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
PROTOCOL No. 14
1. When we come into our kingdom it will be undesirable for us that there should exist any other religion than ours of the One God with whom our destiny is bound up by our position as the Chosen People and through whom our same destiny is united with the destinies of the world. We must therefore sweep away all other forms of belief. If this gives birth to the atheists whom we see to-day, it will not, being only a transitional stage, interfere with our views, but will serve as a warning for those generations which will hearken to our preaching of the religion of Moses, that, by its stable and thoroughly elaborated system has brought all the peoples of the world into subjection to us. Therein we shall emphasize its mystical right, on which, as we shall say, all its educative power is based .... Then at every possible opportunity we shall publish articles in which we shall make comparisons between our beneficent rule and those of past ages. The blessing of tranquillity, though it be a tranquillity forcibly brought about by centuries of agitation, will throw into higher relief the benefits to which we shall point. The errors of the GOYIM governments will be depicted by us in the most vivid hues. We shall implant such an abhorrence of them that the peoples will prefer tranquillity in a state of serfdom to those rights of vaunted freedom which have tortured humanity and exhausted the very sources of human existence, sources which have been exploited by a mob of rascally adventurers who know not what they do .... USELESS CHANGES OF FORMS OF GOVERNMENT TO WHICH WE INSTIGATED THE "GOYIM" WHEN WE WERE UNDERMINING THEIR STATE STRUCTURES, WILL HAVE SO WEARIED THE PEOPLES BY THAT TIME THAT THEY WILL PREFER TO SUFFER ANYTHING UNDER US RATHER THAN RUN THE RISK OF ENDURING AGAIN ALL THE AGITATIONS AND MISERIES THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH. (This "religion of Moses," the so-called "Oral Torah" or Babylonian Talmud, is the antithesis of Moses and the Prophets).
WE SHALL FORBID CHRIST
2. At the same time we shall not omit to emphasize the historical mistakes of the GOY governments which have tormented humanity for so many centuries by their lack of understanding of everything that constitutes the true good of humanity in their chase after fantastic schemes of social blessings, and have never noticed that these schemes kept on producing a worse and never a better state of the universal relations which are the basis of human life ...
3. The whole force of our principles and methods will lie in the fact that we shall present them and expound them as a splendid contrast to the dead and decomposed old order of things in social life.
4. Our philosophers will discuss all the shortcomings of the various beliefs of the "GOYIM," BUT NO ONE WILL EVER BRING UNDER DISCUSSION OUR FAITH FROM ITS TRUE POINT OF VIEW SINCE THIS WILL BE FULLY LEARNED BY NONE SAVE OURS WHO WILL NEVER DARE TO BETRAY ITS SECRETS.
5. IN COUNTRIES KNOWN AS PROGRESSIVE AND ENLIGHTENED WE HAVE CREATED A SENSELESS, FILTHY, ABOMINABLE LITERATURE. For some time after our entrance to power we shall continue to encourage its existence in order to provide a telling relief by contrast to the speeches, party program, which will be distributed from exalted quarters of ours .... Our wise men, trained to become leaders of the GOYIM, will compose speeches, projects, memoirs, articles, which will be used by us to influence the minds of the GOYIM, directing them towards such understanding and forms of knowledge as have been determined by us.
.
Kev, have you seen the GLSEN reading list for young people. GLSEN was headed by Obullshit's "Safe Schools" Czar, a guy named Jennings.
ReplyDeleteA Christian group in Texas decided to read some of the recommended texts on the list. It put paid to my bleeding heart support for "equality" and made clear that the real agenda is from the Protocols.
A few samples of the hardcore gay porn for kiddies:
Revolutionary Voices – Page 220 (A writer is unhappy that she was forced to stop masturbating in public when she turned nine years old.)
I learned the truth about Santa Claus and masturbation in the same year. I was 9. I had a hunch about Santa, but I had no clue about masturbation. I mean, I had no clue there was anything wrong with it. As far as I know, I’ve been masturbating my whole life. But it wasn’t until 9 that I realized it was an impulse that you had to turn off. Especially in class. Fourth grade craft time taught me shame.
Reflections of a Rock Lobster – Page 19 (The author mentions how, while in fifth and sixth grade [age 10 and 11], he often had sex with his male classmates.)
Fortunately, even though being homosexual laid heavily on my conscience during fifth and sixth grades, sex was nevertheless still available. No feelings of guilt entered my mind when having sex with other boys because sex was something spontaneous, and a satisfaction of certain needs.
Reflections of a Rock Lobster – Page 23
(At the age of 12, the author reports being taken aback when the friend with whom he frequently had gay sex asked him “What would you do if you had some pussy right now?”)
Passages of Pride – Pages 33, 34 + 35 (A 15-year-old boy embarks on an intense sexual relationship with a much older adult man.)
Near the end of summer, just before starting his sophomore year in high school, Dan picked up a weekly Twin Cities newspaper. Scanning the classifieds, he came upon an ad for a “Man-2-Man” massage. Home alone one day, he called the telephone number listed in the ad and set up an appointment to meet a man named Tom. Tom offered to drive to Zimmerman. So, over the phone, Dan directed him to a secluded road in his subdivision. “Stop where the pavement ends,” Dan told him.
A couple of nights later, Dan pulled the broken screen from his bedroom window and slipped out of the house while his parents slept. He hurried to the prearranged rendezvous spot, and there, in the dark of night, he met Tom for the first time, man-to-man. In the back of Tom’s van, the two had sex.
“He gave me a little shoulder rub and the next thing I knew his hands were all over me,” Dan remembers. “It wasn’t a bad thing. I didn’t necessarily know it would turn into sex. But I knew what I was doing.”
Dan continued his liaisons with Tom throughout the summer and into the following school year, having sex—usually masturbation and oral sex—with Tom in his van or his Minneapolis apartment.
Even though Tom was older, almost twice Dan’s age, Dan felt unthreatened by him. Dan admits Tom was a “troll” in every sense of the word—an older closeted gay man seeking sex with a man much younger. But Dan says he was not intimidated by the discrepancy in their ages. “He kind of had me in a corner in that he knew I didn’t have access to anything I wanted.” says Dan. “But everything was consensual.”
“He wasn’t exactly a friend,” Dan says of his relationship with Tom. “He wasn’t exactly a lover. He wasn’t exactly a role model. He wasn’t exactly anything. What I got out of it was sex, and someone who made me feel nice for once. Sex was a totally different way to feel good. It was a very easy way to get away from the pain. I was young. He brought me down to the city, where I wanted to be. And I was very young.”
Think the link is still good: www.thegatewaypundit.com/2009/12/breaking-obamas-safe-schools-czar-is-promoting-porn-in-the-classroom-kevin-jennings-and-the-glsen-reading-list/
Kev, one more comment. E. Michael Jones' book, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, is a must read. Wipes away decades of bullshit and Jewish revision of the historical record (http://culturewars.com/books.htm).
ReplyDeleteOnce upon a time, Christianity was strong. Jews were recognized as dangerous and punished frequently for their transgressions. Nations were healthy and the sheeple who have swallowed the poisons from the TV were guided (led) and had morality drummed into their skulls instead of depravity, licentiousness, and slavery to the Jews.
ReplyDeleteIf they were refused to be given a double bed i am with this lady. I have no religion at all but i have morals. The last times are gays everywhere and i think the governments of the illuminati are promoting this perversities. Being gay is not normal, it is only in the head of people. God created a man and a woman to be together and have childre but not two people of the same sex, this is disgusting and fealthy in my opinion
What fundamentally is afoot is a process of the attempted destruction of Western Culture and civilisation by removing its props, one by one.
ReplyDeleteDavid Cameron 'believes' in 'gay marriage'; David Cameron is not an Englishman in any conventional sense. His father was a Jewish cripple who amassed a small fortune whilst working as 'stockbroker' and then offshored it; one can only speculate upon what he might have dripped into his son's ear whilst growing up.
Christianity is a central blank of Western culture; it tells us who we are in the same way that Islam informs Moslems and Judaism, Jews. Jews believe they are a race; they are not. It has been clearly established that they are a mixture of racial groups from Italy, Greece, North Africa, the Caucasus, and, to a smaller extent, the ME. It is only their religion which holds them together. Whereas, all the indigenous peoples of the British Isles share a common ancestry from the time they were attached to the European mainland, although since having evolved different national and Christian identities.
Should the people of the British Isles come together after thousands of years to fight their common enemy; to that end it would be helpful if the Anglican church attempted a rapprochement with the Catholic Church, with the Catholics ditching their 'batchelor' priests and the Anglicans their allegiance to someone who through the institution of Monarchy to the power behind may be a nominal Anglican, Scottish Presbyterian, a mass murderer like Blair or a Jew like Miliband.
Tony Gosling : The Nazis were never defeated - Truthjuice Bristol
ReplyDeleteYoutube:
Watch it, it has to go down as one of the worst gate keeping pieces on zionism.
Gosling is a Marxist shill. I don't trust him at all.
DeleteFascism/Nazism is not Jewish. Marxism/Bolshevism/Communism is Jewish.
I don't really understand this comment. The Nazis were funded by Zionist bankers, weren't they?
ReplyDeleteKB
"I don't really understand this comment. The Nazis were funded by Zionist bankers, weren't they?"
ReplyDeleteYes, but the Nazis and the Zionist bankers are one and the same at the top and its just like a continuation of Zionism over centuries and I don't just mean the more recent political term Zionism. Just like its common knowledge with honest people the Nazis married into the so called royals centuries ago.
This is all too much for me, I'm afraid.
ReplyDeleteI know Tony. I think he's wrong on some things (who isn't?)but I can't see him as a shill.
ReplyDeleteOk,I take your point, but he should not go out of his way to say the Nazis were just Germans and enemies of the Zionists. Which is the common held view point of the misinformed masses. When in fact Nazis and Zionist are one and the same, all planed out many years before to mislead the masses. All honest researchers know this.
It was the Jesuits that were behind the funding of Hitler, not the Zionist Jews (Canaanite Jews). Hitler had no axe to grind with the Christian Religion (which BTW is not Christianity). He and Rome agreed a concordat whereby Rome agreed not to meddle in The Reich's politics. Hitler modelled the Gestapo on the Jesuit Order.
DeleteFurthermore, if Hitler was backed by The Zionist Jews (The Rothschilds) why did he nationalise The Reich's Bank taking it away from Rothschild control and start printing Reich's Notes? This action alone made it possible for Hitler to rebuild Germany in lightning speed. By the mid thirties the German worker was the most affluent and well paid worker in the world. Many of Hitler's speeches included the mocking of Rossevelt's lame duck economic policies which were really just Rothschild economic policies based upon usurious banking. If nothing else Hitler knew the score.
Has the Vatican got agents in US banks? Harriman, wasn't it? Jesuits might try and play power politics but they are no way in charge. The Catholic church has moved into an alliance with international Jewry going by their treatment of Williamson.
ReplyDeleteThe Vatican has agents (Jesuits) everywhere and none more so than in the Alternative Media with Alex Jones and most likely David Icke too.
DeleteUltimately you will find that it's Rome that's in charge, but very secretively.
They all kiss the ring, whether it be Monarchs, Presidents or bankers.
The Pope kisses the Koran as well, just to let us know what's what.
"It was the Jesuits that were behind the funding of Hitler, not the Zionist Jews"
ReplyDeleteAll the above are Nazi Zionist fake jews shenanigans, to take over political Christianity.
I think you will need to explain yourself a bit better than this. Thanking you in advance.
Delete