.
The issue of 'Deicide', the killing of Christ by "the Jews", has (astonishingly in this Talmud-dominated* age) been recently raised in the mainstream media.
Bishop Williamson of the traditionalist Catholic SSPX order has accused Jews of killing Jesus in a (privately circulated) blog posting entitled "How can Pope Benedict let go of ancient truths?" (his article can be read on Michael Hoffman's website here)
BW is correct to state that his position was the mainstream Catholic view for nearly 2000 years until 1962 and the publishing of Nostra Aetate (“In Our Time”), a document contradicting the New Testament and agreeing with the Rabbis that the ancient Jews were not responsible for the execution of Christ.
Williamson states the case thus...."Originally raised by God to cradle the Messiah, alas, when he came they refused, collectively to recognize him. Collectively also, meaning there are always noble exceptions, they have remained faithful to that rejection, so that they changed their religion from that of Abraham and Moses and the Old Testament to that of Anas, Caiphas and the Talmud. Tragically, their very messianic training by God drives them to go on rejecting the one whom they hold to be a false messiah. Until they convert at the end of the world, as the Church has always taught they will do (cf. Rom. XI, 26-27), they seem bound to choose to go on acting, collectively, as enemies of the true Messiah."
Jewish convert to Christianity, Roy Tov, presents some detail about how the Pharisees altered 'the religion of Abraham and Moses' to serve their purposes.
Michael Hoffman surely nails the essence of this issue here and here when he says that those modern Jews who accept The Talmud can rightly be accused of 'Deicide' by Christians because the 'holy book' they follow openly celebrates Christ's murder. It says, amongst other horrible things, that Christ is in hell drowning in boiling excrement and that his mother is a whore.
The Talmud promotes a moral code that is to be practiced amongst Jews only. It promotes hatred (indeed murder and sexual exploitation) of gentiles (we're only 'cattle' you know) and the idea of Jewish supremacism over all other races. A Jew can say a prayer once a year (the Kol Nidre) that undoes all promises and contracts with gentiles for that year.
Let Christians be clear.
And be unafraid to say it.
THE TALMUD IS AN UTTERLY SATANIC DOCUMENT.
As a child attending Mass before 1962 I remember that we always used to says prayers at the end of the service 'for the conversion of Russia' (i.e. the Jews)
This was surely a work of spiritual mercy that the prodigal sons and daughters of 'Israel' return to God.
Catholicism's (and Christianity's at large) abandonment of this aspect of our spiritual and religious focus has proved a greater disaster than we could have imagined.
International banking interests have taken over our governments. Western societies allow their owned leadership to exercise an ideology that is, in practice, Talmudic supremacism on a global stage. The Christian churches have no effective or even mildly useful criticism to make of this diabolical situation.
Our children in Europe are flown (aided by government subsidy) to Auschwitz to witness the scene of ultimate human sacrifice. Auschwitz has displaced Golgotha. Work-shy predators and parasites have thus been protected by a victim-status while they have soared above and gained control of society at large.
It needs to be emphasised that there are legions of gentiles happy to collaborate in the supremacist mission......and that many, many Jews reject the Talmudic ideology. It is unfortunate that some of these buy into that ideology second-hand by accepting precepts of Zionism.
And yet in spite of current Jewish hegemony (this is not too strong a word) over western countries, Rabbis respond to Williamson's statements with something approaching panic.
Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt of the European Council of Rabbis said: "Comments like these take us back decades to the dark days before there was a meaningful and mutually respectful dialogue between Jews and Roman Catholics. There must be no rapprochement within the Catholic church for those of its flock who seek to preach words of hate."
Meaningful?
Mutually respectful?
There has been no sincerity whatsoever in this dialogue on the part of the Talmudists.
None.
Their 'Holy Book' still curses Christ and His mother.
The Christian churches (and the Catholic Church in particular) are in ruins as a result of their abandonment of tradional principle and their willingness to submit to the secular-humanistic Frankfurt-School-created agenda, so heavily funded and promoted by financier-funded think-tanks and Foundations.
Money rules. Global supremacism is our governments' policy of choice. We have abandoned God and are helpless because of it.
For the moment we have no power to stop the Leviathan.
Our choice today is the same as it was for Jews 2000 years ago.
Christ warned us against the Pharisees, those supremacist Jews who abandoned the traditions of Abraham and Moses and put themselves on an equal (or superior when it suited their purpose) footing with God.
He did not even argue with the money-changers. Christ's first act in Holy Week was to drive them from the temple.
We have collectively stopped listening to Christ, upon whom our civilisation was once founded.
We have embraced the enemies of God and the results are there for all to see.
We are all Jews now.
* Our parliamentary system in England began as a talking shop between the king and land-owning barons to create mechanisms that would keep the peace between these thugs and settle disputes with a minimum of risk to life. It has developed in the modern world on the Talmudic model. An almost infinitely flexible and continually developing system of law created for lesser brethren by an elite that (primarily) serve the interests of that elite. The financiers' control over the global political system is now almost complete. Red-team-blue-team-one-party-state-democracies are the primary instruments via which they imprint their lies and Godlessness upon us all.
.
BBC AND CHILD ABUSE
2 minutes ago
The widely circulated 'Judas' video where the gaga uses a deliberately phallic lipstick to smear the 'Jesus' character's lips while the underlying theme of Jesus and Judas 'getting it together' as lovers, is perfectly OK, just a different take on the new Testament.
ReplyDelete'Piss Christ' and a whole host [ no pun intended] of other representations of Jesus acc. to what seems to be variations of a Talmudic theme.
If the Church complains about these 'representations' they're just dismissed as old-fashioned and boring etc, while of course Gaga is celebrated as some kind of pop-Leonardo [ with the added twist that she was educated at Convent of the Sacred Heart]. Thus a tearaway Catholic like Madonna who has now converted to that Qabalistic 'school' to whom she's given some $18million [ allegedly].
Something's afoot and it looks mightily like a cloven hoof
cheers
Thanks for this, Mr. Boyle.
ReplyDeleteHere we go again, make the whole world again the battle field of the religious lunatics. Haven't we had enough? Start thinking, for godsake (no pun intended), god did not create men, men created god; and the rest of your 'holy' books (which seemingly all dropped out of the skies).
ReplyDeleteHow many ages must we go on making wars because of dumb books written by even more dumber people?
Wake up and smell the roses, we are just a tad bit better animals, just here to make our species recreate. One small meteorite and boom! it'all over. The dinosaurs know what I am talking about.
Yes, we need to return to the Truth - the Bible.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise we are no more than cowardly "Christians" - if we could call us selves Christian - I doubt!
Anonymous 11:22
ReplyDeleteStart thinking? it is pretty foolish (if you don't mind my saying so) to imagine that thinking is confined to atheists.
Even if you don't believe in God or a Higher Power you might sensibly acknowledge the enormous moral and spiritual gulf that separates the sublime teachings of Christ from the supremacist ideology of Talmudic rabbis.
You might also recognise that supremacists (Jewish and gentile) who hate humanity (any humanity outside their own vicious greedy group) are in control of our planet.
If you cannot see a systematic spirituality at work here maybe it is you who needs to do the digging and thinking.
Kev. This is an excellent article.
ReplyDeleteI really feel for my Christian brothers who have had their spiritual hearts ripped from the bodies by those who (it could be argued) seem to hate Christianity more than they hate Islam. This could be due to Jewish coveting of power that seemed synonymous with "White", or if you prefer, "European" Christianity since the Roman conquest of Palestine, as well as the 'Jewish' need to reject Christ, for it was Jesus who showed them just how corrupt they had become. Jesus's message would have robbed them of the seductive (& wrong) belief that they had God in handcuffs locked into an unconditional Covenant where worship of Baal and prophet killing were somehow permissible.
What the Talmud says about Jesus and his noble Mother turns the stomachs of both Muslims and good Christians alike.
Islamic teaching of the end days makes it perfectly clear what fate awaits these Zionists/Pharisees but because it falls outside the created bounds of political correctness, some Muslims today try to apologise for it and whitewash what it says.
There is a reason why the history of the Hebrews (later: 'Jews') is known to such an extraordinary extent. It is a clear message of what direction NOT to go in.
"Here we go again, make the whole world again the battle field of the religious lunatics."
ReplyDelete. If you look back in history those religious lunatics were mostly atheists pretending to represent God and Christ in Jesus, the same as it is today. Some were and are the blind leading the blind, but if we search we can see the enormous moral and spiritual Love, but with justice sought as others can spoil it for others.
. Just cause and effect, sowing and reaping, here on earth and the whole of the Universe is cause and effect. A human being, who knows he is a Being, has no fear and no fear of “One small meteorite and boom! It’ll over.” Matter/firmament.
Good article. The attitudes toward Christ in the Talmud are reflected on Israeli TV:
ReplyDeletehttp://youtu.be/JA6vRC1xW_c
Christians have been trying to hold "mutually respectful" dialogue with such people for years now, but to what purpose? It has obviously been a waste of time. Speaking only for myself, as a Christian, I have no interest in holding any further such dialogue.
Greetings Kevin,
ReplyDeleteWhat are "Jewish groups"?
Post WWII American "Jewish groups" who can control, or at least subvert the democratic process, and control the fate of an American president based solely upon their Zionist ambitions?
"In 1948, 'The Palestinian issue' as it was known at the State Dept. had been long festering. Survivors of the Holocaust were pouring into their biblical homeland and demanding the creation of an independent Zionist state. For reasons both political and humanitarian, Truman wanted to help create a new state of Israel.
HE WAS, AS WELL, UNDER TREMENDOUS PRESSURE FROM JEWISH GROUPS, WHOSE SUPPORT HE BADLY NEEDED TO STAY IN THE WHITE HOUSE."
-Issacson and Thomas, The Wise Men, p. 451
However, "his (Truman's) most trusted foreign policy advisers (Marshall, Lovett, Forrestal, Kennan, Bohlen, and Acheson) were against it.
...however humanitarian a Jewish homeland might seem; it posed a real threat to US national security."
Yet "Jewish groups" who can subvert the democratic process are not a threat?
The "Wise Men", Truman's "most trusted" intellects and foreign policy advisers, were somewhat indifferent to post WWII Jewry. In fact, according to Issacson and Thomas they were;
"intellectually unsympathetic, not viscerally anti-Semitic"
Of course they weren't. There was no "holocaust" then to speak of, Ben-Gurion wanted the "world to know" in 1961. There were no photos or any other manner of credible evidence to present to Truman's "most trusted" that would have rendered them impotent, and certainly NOT "intellectually unsympathetic".
The wise men, and their chronological proximity to events coupled with being Truman's "most trusted" intellects afforded them the ability to be "intellectually unsympathetic"; as there was NO holocaust of the alleged magnitude we hear of today to brow-beat them with.
I'm left to wonder what kind of "tremendous pressure" that these "Jewish groups" applied to a potential "brother". Hilberg himself was just about to commence his "research" on the holocaust as presidents, writers, historians, and academics were completely ignoring it.
"Hilberg has recently reminded audiences of the lonely task that research on the Holocaust was when he first began in 1948. Professional writers and academic historians were virtually ignoring the subject."
-Michael Marrus, The Holocaust in History, p. 200
Hence, the "wise men" were "intellectually unsympathetic."
However,
"No amount of historical investigation should be permitted to detract from the awesome horror of these events..."
-ibid, p.6
whoah this blog is magnificent i really like reading your posts. Stay up the great work! You realize, many individuals are looking around for this information, you could aid them greatly.
ReplyDeleteAlso see my site :: Jazz Mp3