.
So Wikileaks has exposed the truth about the Afghan/Pakistan war? 91,000 leaked documents expose the fact that war is a nasty, two-faced, dishonorable business with even (shock horror) covert operations set up to assassinate leaders of the enemy.
What is getting most attention, however, is the allegation that the ISI (the Pakistani Secret Service) is secretly backing the Taliban and other documents demanding that the Pakistani government turn decisively against the militants, creating a justification for US operations inside Pakistan and a possible pretext for full-on invasion of the country.
A few months ago we were reading that the US were funding the Taliban. There are many other stories of this kind from people like Webster Tarpley and Wayne Madsen.
WHISTLEBLOWING?
All this 'whistleblowing' does little other than serve the interests of the US possibly expanding their war. No establishment figure is seriously compromised by these 'leaks', nor is policy undermined in any new way. The war is wicked? The people who care already know that and this 'new' information makes little difference to that perception one way or the other.
Why do the 'leaks' contain no embarrassing whistleblowing. Why is there no exposition of the betrayal felt by many soldiers and their officers who know the war(s) have got nothing to do with protecting America or the UK (....I have spoken to one British army officer who is acutely aware of the betrayal of his troops and of wider British interests and is waiting for [and working towards] the same revolution as myself. Meeting this man was the most encouraging moment of the last six months for me).
Wikileaks made its name with this footage.
Again, innocent people get murdered by coalition troops. Evil...embarrassing....but tell us something we didn't know.
We know that the powers-that-be are determined to control both sides of every argument. They lead the opposition against themselves. That's why "Stop The War" will not even MENTION 9/11 Truth and exclude from the ranks of their leadership anyone who wants to raise reasonable questions about the events of 9/11.
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is 'annoyed' by 9/11 truth. That there IN ITSELF makes him, to any sensible person, a placeman of the security services.
This, like the StopTheWar position, is called a 'limited hangout'. There is no end of this kind of maneuvering out there as in, for example, Chomsky's indefatigable support of Israel ("America" is the problem, not the international bankers who own it nor the Jewish Lobby who control it.....criticism most definitely never goes THERE. These are simply NOT issues).
LIMITED HANGOUT
'Limited hangout' is making a pretense at protest in order to disable genuine protest.
IT IS USING TRUTH TO SERVE LIES.
It is the Hegelian dialectic in action.
Many good people are led down futile paths when they trust and follow these people.
Even the name for the operation, 'Wikileaks', tells a story.
Here we see one CIA/Mossad operation supporting another. We are supposed to see 'Wiki' and think 'truth' as in that honourable internet encyclopedia 'Wikipedia'(......whose 'Mossad' entry, by the way, does NOT include their famous motto, "By way of deception thou shalt make war"). There is a lifetimes work for somebody exposing the spinning and obfuscation in support of establishment narratives on this lousy site.
For a more detailed look at the 'Wikileaks' operation see here.
LATE NEWS
Uh-O. Lookee here....Wikileaks 'reveal' that Bin Laden was being tracked through Pakistan:
"In August 2006, a US intelligence report placed Bin Laden at a meeting in Quetta, over the border in Pakistan.
It said he and others - including the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar - were organising suicide attacks in Afghanistan."
So there it is. That evil fiend, Bin Laden, is not dead (as most people who follow the information believe). He is alive and well and organising Al Qaeda, or is it the Taliban, to carry out suicide bombings against our boys in Afghanistan.
Well, now we know.
Don't we?
AND MORE FROM RUSSIA TODAY
UPDATE:
Gordon Duff says Wikileaks is Israel and the main target of this exercise is India.....being dragged into fighting Israel's enemy Pakistan. Worth a read.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/29/gordon-duff-wiki-leaks-is-isreal-like-we-all-didnt-know/
NSA: Behind the Edward Snowden “smoke screen”
37 minutes ago
Really good post Kev. Judging by the amount of nearly instantaneous scepticism from the online community it seems many are getting wise to their nefarious schemes. A classic gatekeeper operation - establish some credible bona fides and then slip in poisoned meat.
ReplyDeleteOperation mincemeat from WWII is a good example. The fiendish British secret services planted a dead body with lots of juicy secret documents and let it wash up on a Spanish coast. This made the Germans think that the allies were invading Greece as opposed to Sicily.
Alternatively it could also be a double cross. Lots of false “secrets” being used to poison the Wikileaks well to neuter any really good stuff later on. Smoke and Mirrors Kev just like the good old days in Belfast.
Thanks... Can't help but feel this 'leak ' has some connection to article of Press TV July 5th 2010 which appeared in Truth Seeker regarding "US to Blame Iran for Afghanistan failure" The false Afghan Video that has already been prepared by US film makers is due its premier....? !
ReplyDeleteI am sure that the documents were sanitized before the leak to hide proof that America needs Pakistan to give it a credible straw man to keep knocking-down in Afghanistan. But it does crystallize public awareness that Pakistan is the state sponsor of the Taliban. This may prove to be the equivalent of the "yellow cake" Iraq report. http://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2010/07/27/the-biggest-secret-that-wikileaks-doesnt-reveal-america-wants-pakistan-to-support-the-taliban/
ReplyDeleteHi Kev,
ReplyDeleteOutstanding analysis. I often thought it strange this Wikileaks guy was still walking around and not the target of an 'extraordinary rendition' so in vogue amongst the criminal temporal 'leaders' of the so called 'free world'.
The playbook used by these clowns doesn't change very much, they just put more additives in our water/food and pump more chemicals out of aeroplanes to dumb the population down, although I suspect even these measures are not paying the dividends they once did.
False flag time must be around the corner as this morning's Metro had the names of the seven individuals trusted with safeguarding the internet named along with their country of origin.
Now, why would someone do that?
Keep up the good work!
Jim
Remember what Gerald Celente said, the military is looking to expand it's "war on terror" into Pakistan.
ReplyDeleteI suspect the target objective with Pakistan is to neutralise its Nukes. It wouldn't do to have an Islamic country capable of a retaliatory strike should Iran get fried by israeli nuclear weapons.
ReplyDeleteOf course, there is always the pipeline to the Indian Ocean as well to consider, must not forget the profits from oil and gas should Turkey not return to the fold.
The Belfast Telegraph quotes this Assange character as being dismissive of 911 Truthers. A smart guy like him couldn't fail to see self evident truths and to deny them makes him one of them - QED.
Jim
I knew that without reading your article. There are intelligent people, does we regain their good sense and freed themselve from the false reality constructed like a prison around our minds, byt the medias, the culture and now internet.
ReplyDeletePropaganda as always existed. Nowadays there are three distinct sources of informations: the official media, the false alternative one and the true alternative one. No need to describe how wrong the medias are and how they manipulate you, and no need to explain you what is a good source of information with relevant information. But the one in the middle is interesting and Wikileaks falls exactly into this category.
False alternative medias presents themselves as such, and try to cultivate their credibility by touching more or less to topics you would expect such source talks about like Bilderberg or the War.
But in truth, there are just diverting you from the relevant informations, and they use the same subtle manipulative technics as official medias do.
In fact sometimes they go exactly in the same way than the official medias.
How to recognize them? Well let's take Wikileaks: it pretends to leak secret documents. How come they've not been shut down, attacked, how did they get their leak nowing than nowadays 90% of leaks are controled one?
How come the founder got half a billion of financing from a private organism just a month ago, speaked at TED just two weeks ago, and got a huge coverage from mass media that didn't forget to remind us how important for freedom of speech websites like Wikileaks are...my ass.
Plus it's really easy to see the big picture here: There have been more and more news and reports about how the war in Afghanistans is bad and many soldiers are killed, how convenient that a document leaked several days after! And how convenient that is not about Irak, but rather in a non-profitable conflict that is Afganistan!
How convenient that whole the soldiers that they can retrieve from Afghanistan can be used somewhere else, just near this country...
and don't forget the possibility to use this as an excuse to limit internet access from all us minions...
ReplyDeleteKev Boyle,
ReplyDeleteThis is a very good post. People who get involved in researching this area - the politics behind the politics - absolutely need to understand from the very beginning how incredibly insidious the whole field is. It is filled with pathological liars and deceivers - but very skilled deceivers. You can't just pick someone who tells you the truth and follow him. You need to continually be questioning and evaluating and thinking. We need more posts like this. Eric Hufschmid was exposing stuff like this but it turns out that he may be a disinformation agent himself.
When considering the rollout of this latest CIA misinformation campaign, don't forget to look back on the Wurlitzeresque profile of Julian Assange just a few weeks ago in the New Yorker: certainly in my reading it offered quite a few tells about what the organization is really about, so that I wasn't particularly surprised by this 'massive' and 'embarrassing' document dump on Afghanistan--which in fact embarrassed no one of prominence, as you correctly observe. Thanks for your smart post.
ReplyDeleteThanks for this. You are right. I'd foolishly let my guard down.
ReplyDeleteIt has to be true to say that people grow tired of all the lies mainstream media push to ordinary citizens. Thus being an average joe, the internet becomes the last bastion for truth that is left in this world. To me, mainstream newspaper should do the world a favor and print their newspaper with 2 ply absorbent paper so that after reading the bullshit, i can show my loyalty to it by wiping my ass with it. Its the green thing to do these days. And as for Assange/wiki man, how is it that he can walk the earth freely whilst being a threat to national security? Something amiss here.
ReplyDeleteSo lets all blame the failings of an illegal war on the works of Pakistan and Iran... yes! that will be a great excuse/reason to go make war more illegal war ..... Divide and Conquer!
ReplyDeleteThe sheeple are so blind to the obvious truth.
Humanity really really needs to open its eyes and bloody well wake up!!!! Fast !
Hey Kevin Boyle,...excellent work; nice to see that we have some semblance of restraint among the ranks of the genuine ‘truth’ fraternity. As with the BP oil leak (aaaggh – the sky is falling the sky is falling – take a look at Nigeria people) so many half-arsed wanna-be truthers are falling all over each other at the water cooler cooing and ooh aahhing and wasting their time downloading this woftam to fumble through its Mil’ speak jargon. It’s a lemon.
ReplyDeletePerhaps many aren’t aware that one of the first and best sites for truth, by way of hard edged audio visual files was ‘Ogrish.com’, much of the video content was just plain gore. None the less; the documentary video files of un-edited brutal reality that pertained to the wars for Wall Street were vital as a resource for any genuine anti-war campaigner that knew the power and effect of factual footage as a means of shocking the sheeple out of their unconscious state. Ogrish.com was gagged and bound (hoodwinked), then released as ‘LiveLeaks’ a soft-cock’d puckered-up sissy of a site that has drifted down wriggling into the silt of obscurity like a shot shark. ‘Wikileaks’ looks like a duck and now that it has quacked out loud – it sounds like a duck.
If Assange is a truther my aunties’ name is JACK!
SNAFU; keep it moving ladies; we have some dangerous ground to cover before we make our RV.
Brother Boyle...
veritas
Been suspicious of Mr. Assmange for a while. I guess this just confirms it! CONTROLLED OPPOSITION!
ReplyDeleteI too used to be an avid viewer of Liveleaks until its owner had his much touted 'meeting' with a NATO general,suddenly all pro-muslim,anti-US vids were forbidden and anti-war members like myself and many others found ourselves thrown out.He obviously was given the hard word by NATO no matter how much he tried to show his importance by meeting a NATO general.He sold out by taking the cowards option and I also agree that Wiki-leaks is a real dis-info site.
ReplyDeleteHmm yes very good observations, Wikileaks, does not suprise me they are a new world puppet toy, the wiki part kinda spelt it out for anyone who has two brain cells to make a connection lol (those who still are stuggling, pls just go obey your masters like good sheeple).
ReplyDeleteAs for moveing the war into Pakistan as a full scale invasion and occupation, in the "interests of world safety" etc, good luck on them trying.
Iran and Pakistan are not third world nations with decrepid armies and hardware like Iraq and Afghanistan were. Now if the coallition is having a hard time beating these backwards (in terms on military power, traning and hardware compared to the west) nations, how in the hell do they expect to take on any nation with a capability to sink naval carrier groups? Let alone the capability to stop air superiority!
Lets face it, if the coallition had no air support, there would be ten fold the amount of dead soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Imagine the death toll to the coallition in Pakistan or Iran given the modern and sophisticated hardware both countries have at their disposal.
Then again they could just nuke Iran and neuter Pakistans nukes to stop retaliation, but like Pakistan would ever counter nuke in the first place, a dozen counter nukes in the face of thousands of coallition nukes turning your country into glass for counter nuking, doubt any general or president of Pakistan would ever have the balls to turn his nation to glass.
Now wasn't it Wikileaks where I downloaded 20,000 pages of text messages on 9-11? Hmmm... can't remember...
ReplyDeletein any event exposing Assange as a cutout is disturbing. How sad.
Are we all doomed to become carnival barkers on the take when we get in a position to make a difference and enough lolly's shaken in our face? Or conversely, the threat of a live boy or a dead girl in our beds?
Huh? Since when did Chomsky support Israel?
ReplyDelete--
In any case, I think the jury is still out on WL, and may be for quite some time.
Since when? since here:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=13048
WL is an obvious CIA operation. Wake up!
You believe an August 2006 US intelligence report? You are sicker than I thought. Although some good info about who has seriously looked at 9/11 evidence (not Assange!).
ReplyDelete